Free Identity and Access Management practice questions
10 free SY0-801 questions on Identity and Access Management, each with a full explanation — no account needed. This section sits in the Security Operations part of the exam. Answer every question to see your score, then read the lessons below for anything you missed.
The top folder of a department share has an NTFS entry granting Domain Users Read, with inheritance on. An administrator creates a Merger subfolder inside it and adds an entry granting the executive group Modify. Who can read the Merger folder?
Inheritance flows the parent folder's Read for Domain Users down to every subfolder, and allow entries add together, so the executives' new entry widens access without replacing what was inherited. Nothing about the folder looks wrong until someone checks effective access, which is how sensitive folders inside broad shares end up readable by everyone.
An engineer's Active Directory account was deleted on her last day. A week later she is rehired, and an administrator creates a new account with the same user name and adds it to her old groups. Folders that had been shared with her account directly still deny her. Why?
Windows stores permissions against the account's security identifier, not its name, and recreating a deleted account produces a new SID, so entries granted to the old account no longer apply and show as an unresolved SID. Re-adding her groups restores only group-based access. That is one reason accounts are disabled first and deleted after a retention period: a disabled account keeps its SID and everything tied to it.
HR records that an accounts payable clerk transfers to the marketing team effective Monday. Under a sound mover process, what happens to her accounts payable group memberships?
A sound mover process treats a role change like a leave followed by a join: the old role's groups come off on the effective date, the new role's groups go on, and any old access still needed is requested and approved explicitly. Keeping old access until a review, through a handover or as read-only is how employees end up holding access from several jobs, which is privilege creep.
A company is hiring a remote developer whom nobody will meet in person. Before the first credential is released, which step BEST confirms that the person is who they claim to be?
Identity proofing confirms the person before a credential exists, and for a remote hire that means checking a document and matching it to the live person, for example with a selfie match or a supervised video session. A FIDO2 key is the tempting choice, but strong authentication can't help if the credential goes to the wrong person, and a birth date or an emailed password proves nothing about who is on the other end.
Attackers are signing in to a company's SaaS applications as administrators, and the identity provider shows no password or MFA events for those sessions. Investigators believe the attackers stole the IdP's token-signing private key. Which control would BEST have prevented this?
With the signing key, attackers can mint assertions for any user that every service provider will accept, without touching a password or an MFA prompt; this is Golden SAML, and keeping the key in an HSM or managed key service protects it. MFA is the tempting answer, but forged assertions skip the IdP's sign-in entirely, and a shorter validity window only means the attacker mints fresh ones.
An employee clicked Accept on a consent screen for an app called Mail Security Scanner that asked to read all mail with offline access. The security team reset her password and her MFA methods, yet the attacker is still reading her mailbox. What should the team do?
Consent phishing gives the attacker's app its own OAuth tokens, so no password was stolen and resetting it doesn't cut the app off; the fix is to revoke the app's consent grant and restrict which apps users can approve without an administrator. Another password reset, number matching and a new MFA device all protect the sign-in, which the attacker never needed.
Developers of a company's field-service mobile app want staff to sign in through the corporate identity provider, and the app needs a signed JSON token that tells it who the user is. Which should they implement?
OpenID Connect adds an ID token on top of OAuth: a signed JSON Web Token with claims such as the issuer, the user's identifier and the intended app. An OAuth access token is the tempting choice, but it says what an app may do, not who the user is; SAML assertions are XML designed for browsers, and an LDAP bind makes the app collect the user's password itself.
Ten internal web apps each show their own login form, and each checks the user's directory password with an LDAP bind. Users say they have single sign-on because the password is the same everywhere. What is this arrangement actually called?
When every application checks the same directory password, users have one password but still type it into each app, and each app handles it; that is same sign-on. With true SSO the applications never see the password, federation means one organization's IdP vouches for users at another's service, and delegated authorization is what OAuth provides.
An attacker captures a valid SAML assertion issued for the company's CRM and, 20 minutes later, presents it to the company's HR portal. Which parts of the assertion cause the HR portal to reject it?
An assertion's conditions limit it to one audience, here the CRM, and a short time window, so it is useless to a different service and worthless a few minutes later. A copied assertion still carries a valid signature, which is exactly why the conditions matter, and the attribute statement and issuer don't restrict where or when it can be used.
Using an ordinary domain user account, an attacker requests Kerberos service tickets for every account with a service principal name and cracks one service account's password offline within an hour. Which control would MOST directly have made the cracking impractical?
Kerberoasting cracks the part of the ticket encrypted with a key derived from the service account's password, so a long random password, or a group managed service account whose password the domain rotates, makes the offline cracking impractical. Denying interactive logon is the tempting choice, but it limits what a known password can do rather than how hard it is to crack, and lockout never triggers because the guessing happens offline.
Study this section
Every lesson that covers Identity and Access Management on the SY0-801 exam.
- Provisioning, Deprovisioning, and Identity Proofing
- Federation and Single Sign-On: SAML, OAuth, and LDAP
- Account Types: User, Privileged, Service, Third-Party, and Emergency Access
- Multifactor Authentication Methods
- Access Control Models: Role, Rule, Mandatory, Discretionary, Time-Based, and Just-in-Time
- Passwords, Passkeys, and Access Reviews