Free PKI and Certificates practice questions
10 free SY0-801 questions on PKI and Certificates, each with a full explanation — no account needed. This section sits in the Cryptography and PKI part of the exam. Answer every question to see your score, then read the lessons below for anything you missed.
Which certificate field records whether a certificate is allowed to sign other certificates?
Basic constraints marks a certificate as a CA with CA:TRUE or as an end entity with CA:FALSE, and a CA:FALSE certificate can't sign other certificates. The Subject Alternative Name lists the names a certificate covers, the serial number identifies it for revocation, and the validity period sets when it is accepted.
A partner asks for a copy of the company web server's certificate. A junior administrator exports a .pfx file from the server and prepares to email it. Why should a senior administrator stop this?
PKCS #12 files with a .pfx or .p12 extension bundle a certificate with its private key and need the same protection as a password, so only the certificate itself should be shared. A certificate is public by design and is handed to every client that connects, so sharing it is harmless; email doesn't alter it, and the partner has no reason to request a certificate of its own.
During an audit, an analyst finds an unfamiliar root certificate in the Trusted Root Certification Authorities store on several laptops. IT didn't deploy it. Why is this a serious concern?
Whoever controls a root in a device's trust store can issue a certificate for any name and the device will accept it, which lets an attacker intercept encrypted traffic without warnings; some malware adds roots for exactly this reason. A trust store entry doesn't change certificate dates, switch off revocation checks or expose the laptop's private keys.
Smart card logons and VPN authentication suddenly fail across a company. Its PKI has an offline root CA and an online issuing CA, and the root's CRL is past its Next Update date. What should the PKI team do?
An offline root still publishes a revocation list with an expiry date, so someone must power it on to re-sign the list before it lapses, and systems that demand current revocation data fail until that happens. Leaving the root online permanently exposes the PKI's most valuable key, reissuing certificates doesn't renew the root's CRL, and disabling revocation checks removes a security control.
An internal CA's root is deployed to Windows devices through Group Policy, and the server sends its leaf and intermediate certificates. A browser on one PC opens the internal site without warnings, but a Java application on the same PC rejects the certificate as untrusted. What is the MOST likely cause?
Trust stores differ by platform: Group Policy adds the root to the Windows store, but Java applications often ship with a separate cacerts file, so the same chain can validate in one application and fail in another on the same machine. The server already sends its intermediate, a SAN problem would break the browser too, and every root certificate is self-signed by design.
In which situation is a self-signed certificate an acceptable choice?
Self-signed certificates encrypt as well as CA-issued ones but give clients no identity assurance, so they fit labs, development and test systems that only their builders use. Customers and partners need a public CA, and an internal site used daily needs a certificate from an internal CA whose root is pushed to company devices, so employees don't learn to click through warnings.
A startup needs a publicly trusted TLS certificate for its marketing site today, with automated issuance and little or no cost. Which certificate BEST fits?
Domain validation only confirms control of the domain, is automated, takes minutes and is often free. OV and EV add checks of the organization's legal identity that usually take days, and a self-signed certificate isn't publicly trusted at all. All of them encrypt equally well; the validation level changes the vetting, not the encryption.
A company installs one wildcard certificate and its private key on 25 servers, including a rarely patched test server. Which risk does this create?
Every server holds the same private key, so the least protected machine holds a key that can impersonate www, mail and every other subdomain, and revoking it takes every site down at once. Wildcards actually keep individual hostnames out of Certificate Transparency logs, browsers don't care how many servers share a certificate, and the encryption is the same as any other certificate's.
An administrator tries to sign a PowerShell script with a certificate whose extended key usage lists only TLS Web Server Authentication, and the signing fails. What is the MOST likely reason?
The extended key usage field states what a certificate may do, and software that checks it refuses a certificate presented for any other purpose, so a TLS server certificate can't sign code. Who issued the certificate doesn't change what it may be used for, SAN lists hold names such as DNS names rather than file names, and ECDSA is a current signature algorithm.
A company will launch a secret product at launchpad.example.com next month and wants a publicly trusted certificate installed now without revealing that hostname before launch. Which choice BEST meets this goal?
Public CAs record every TLS certificate in Certificate Transparency logs, so any certificate naming launchpad.example.com makes the hostname searchable. A wildcard publishes only *.example.com, which still covers that single-level name. A SAN entry, an EV certificate or the common name of an OV certificate all publish the name, and EV certificates can't be wildcards anyway.
Study this section
Every lesson that covers PKI and Certificates on the SY0-801 exam.