Free Common Safety Procedures practice questions
10 free 220-1202 questions on Common Safety Procedures, each with a full explanation — no account needed. This section sits in the Operational Procedures part of the exam. Answer every question to see your score, then read the lessons below for anything you missed.
A technician is preparing to reseat a RAM module inside a desktop PC. After shutting down the operating system and switching off the PSU rocker switch, what should the technician do NEXT before touching internal components?
After shutting down and switching off the PSU, the next step is to unplug the power cord from the wall and press and hold the power button for a few seconds to discharge remaining energy in the system. This removes the primary energy source (wall power) and lowers the chance of shorting components while working. Switching off the PSU alone should never be trusted, since the switch is not a guarantee that internal circuits are de-energized. Immediately removing the RAM while holding the metal chassis skips the critical power-discharge step and does not properly control static, since simply gripping the case is only a backup method, not the primary control. Clipping an ESD strap to painted metal is a common mistake because paint blocks electrical contact, so the strap cannot actually drain static; a strap must connect to a known unpainted bonded ground point or an approved ESD mat ground. Spraying compressed air into RAM slots at this stage is premature and unnecessary; compressed air use also requires safety glasses to protect against blowback debris. The proper power-down flow reduces stored energy and prevents accidental shorts before any internal contact is made.
A technician clips an ESD wrist strap to a painted portion of a computer case and begins installing a GPU. Why is this method unsafe for controlling static?
An ESD strap works by providing a low-resistance path so static charge drains slowly and safely to ground. Painted surfaces act as an insulating barrier that can block electrical contact, so clipping to painted metal means the strap is not actually grounded and cannot drain charge. The strap should instead connect to a known ground point such as an approved ESD mat ground connection or an unpainted, bonded chassis point. The claim that painted metal amplifies static charge is incorrect; paint does not generate or amplify charge, it simply prevents a reliable connection. Clipping the strap to the PSU input is dangerous and wrong, since the strap controls static only and must never be connected to a live power source, which could expose the technician to mains voltage. Painted metal does not create a direct path to mains voltage; a properly powered-down and unplugged system has no mains present, and the concern with paint is the lack of contact, not the presence of high voltage. Verifying a real connection to ground is the key principle: if a technician cannot confirm the strap has a true path to ground, the setup should be treated as ungrounded and corrected before continuing work.
A user brings in an older CRT monitor that has stopped displaying an image. Which of the following is the SAFEST action for a PC technician to take?
CRT monitors contain high-voltage circuits that can retain a dangerous charge long after being unplugged, so the safest action is to refer the unit to qualified service or replace it entirely. This crosses the line from standard PC repair into high-risk electronics work that requires proper training and safety procedures. Opening the rear housing to discharge the internal capacitors is exactly the kind of task that should be avoided without specialized training, since improper discharge of a CRT can cause serious injury. Replacing an internal backlight assembly applies to some LCD displays, not CRTs, and probing high-voltage sections of any display still carries elevated risk; CRTs do not use a backlight in the same way and their high-voltage circuitry remains hazardous. Probing the high-voltage section with a multimeter puts the technician directly in contact with potentially lethal stored energy, which is never the appropriate next step for these devices. The exam mindset rewards choosing the safest next action rather than the most curious one. When a device shows serious electrical risk or falls outside safe serviceability, the correct approach is to isolate the unit, replace it, or escalate it to trained personnel to protect both the technician and the customer's property.
While troubleshooting a workstation, a technician notices the plug feels warm to the touch and wiggles loosely in the wall outlet. What does this MOST likely indicate?
A warm plug combined with a loose fit in the outlet most likely indicates a poor connection with excessive resistance, which raises both shock and fire risk. Loose plugs allow intermittent contact that can arc and generate heat, and heat at a connection point is a symptom that should always be treated seriously: warm is a warning and hot is an emergency. A properly functioning connection should not produce noticeable heat at the plug face regardless of current draw, so this is not normal operation for a high-current device. Warmth and looseness are signs of worn contacts or overload, not evidence of correct grounding; grounding provides a fault path and has nothing to do with a plug heating up. A surge protector absorbing a spike does its work inside the protector's MOVs, not at the wall plug, and absorbing a surge would not loosen the plug in the receptacle. The technician should stop using the outlet, investigate the power path, and have the worn outlet or connection repaired to prevent arcing, overheating, or a fire.
A technician is installing a large, heavy GPU into a PCIe slot. Which handling practice BEST prevents physical damage to the card and slot?
Heavy components need support during installation, so the technician should support the card with one hand while aligning the bracket and seating the connector. A large GPU can flex the PCIe slot and the card itself if it is allowed to hang, and controlled support prevents that stress. Wiggling the card side to side is a poor practice because side-to-side movement spreads pins and can crack solder joints; connectors should be aligned first, then pressed evenly with controlled pressure. Gripping the card by its gold contact fingers contaminates the contacts with skin oils and pressure, which can cause connection problems, so components should always be held by their edges with hands kept off the gold fingers. Pressing down hard with heavy force is risky because if a connector does not seat with normal force, that usually signals a misalignment, and forcing it can bend pins or crack the board; the correct response is to stop and re-check alignment. Proper technique treats components like lab glassware, since most damage comes from small slips rather than dramatic drops. Supporting the weight of a large card while aligning and applying even, controlled pressure protects both the card and the slot, and during removal the retention clip should be released first before lifting the card straight out while still supporting its weight.
A technician is setting up a repair bench and wants to ensure a safe, properly grounded power configuration. Which setup BEST follows electrical safety best practices?
A safe bench starts with a properly grounded outlet and a single, tidy power path, so the best setup is a grounded wall outlet feeding a single reputable surge protector or UPS with all bench equipment on that one source. This reduces confusion about where power comes from, makes emergency shutdown faster, and ensures a real ground path is present. Using a two-prong adapter feeding a power strip and an extension cord is unsafe because a two-prong 'cheater' adapter typically removes the ground connection, leaving the equipment without a designed fault path, and extension cords used as permanent wiring increase wear and overload risk. Daisy-chaining one power strip into a second power strip violates the rule against daisy chains, which increase overload risk and create confusion about the power path. Using an ungrounded strip with cords routed across foot traffic combines two hazards: the lack of grounding removes a critical safety layer, and cables crossing walking paths create trip hazards and can be pinched or cut, leading to faults. The safest approach follows three rules: keep all bench equipment on a single power source, avoid daisy chains, and route cables so they cannot be pinched, cut, or tripped over. Fewer connections, shorter runs, and confirmed grounding together reduce both shock risk and equipment damage.
A technician is preparing to replace a memory module and a network expansion card in a user's workstation. Which of the following describes the correct way to physically handle these components?
The guiding principle of component handling is to touch as little of the sensitive circuitry as possible. Memory modules should be gripped on their short side edges, never on the gold pins along the bottom, because both skin oils and static can damage the contacts. Expansion cards and motherboards should be held by their edges or metal mounting bracket, keeping fingers away from gold connector contacts, chips, and traces. Holding the RAM by its gold pins is incorrect because the pins are the exact contacts that must be protected from oils and static discharge. Holding both components by their gold contacts is wrong for the same reason and would risk damaging both parts. Holding the RAM by its top edge and the card by its connector fingers is incorrect because touching the connector fingers of an expansion card exposes the traces and contacts to the same static and contamination risks. Proper handling prevents both immediate damage and the latent degradation that can cause intermittent failures later.
A senior technician who is trained and authorized to service CRT monitors is about to open one to diagnose a display fault. Which of the following safety practices applies specifically to working inside this type of equipment?
For ordinary PC support the right answer to a failed CRT is not to open it at all but to replace it or refer it to qualified service; this question assumes a technician who is trained and permitted to do that work. Inside high-voltage equipment such as a CRT or a power supply you should not wear a standard ESD wrist strap. The strap's purpose is to create a path between you and ground, and its current-limiting resistor is designed for static, not for the tens of thousands of volts a CRT's anode and capacitors can hold long after the unit is unplugged; becoming that path is exactly what you must avoid. Clipping a strap to the monitor chassis or to a grounded mat both deliberately tie the technician to ground next to stored high voltage, and a heel strap does the same thing through the floor. Any personal grounding device is wrong here for the same reason.
A technician left their ESD wrist strap at the bench but needs to install a stick of RAM at a user's desk. Which of the following is the BEST alternative to reduce the risk of electrostatic discharge?
When no wrist strap is available, the correct fallback is self-grounding by touching a bare-metal, grounded part of the computer's chassis before and while working, and repeating that contact often. This keeps the technician at the same electrical potential as the equipment so static bleeds off harmlessly. Self-grounding is less reliable than a strap because any movement can rebuild a charge, so regrounding frequently is essential. Working quickly is incorrect because rushing does not remove accumulated static and increases the chance of skipped steps and mistakes. Holding the module by its gold pins is wrong because those pins are the most sensitive contacts and should never be touched, as skin oils and static both cause damage. Setting the module on top of an antistatic bag is incorrect because a shielding bag only protects what is inside it; placing a bare component on top offers no protection and can even expose it to static from the surrounding surface. The safest habit is to keep the part in its bag until grounded and ready to install.
A user reports that a workstation the technician repaired last week now suffers from random crashes and intermittent errors, even though the new expansion card was tested and worked when installed. Which of the following is the MOST likely cause?
ESD damage comes in two forms, and the pattern described matches degradation, also called a latent or 'walking wounded' failure. In this type of damage, a discharge weakens a component without killing it, so it works at first but fails prematurely, producing intermittent crashes and random errors days or weeks later. Because the damage cannot be seen, felt, or reliably tested, it is nearly impossible to trace back to the moment it occurred. A catastrophic ESD failure is incorrect because that type destroys the part outright, meaning it simply would not work at all rather than failing intermittently after a week. A trip hazard from poor cable management is a genuine safety concern but relates to physical injury and equipment falls, not internal crashes and random errors. Residual capacitor charge stored in the power supply is a personal shock and short-circuit hazard during handling, but it does not explain an intermittent fault appearing a week after a successful repair. This latent failure pattern is exactly why prevention through grounding and proper handling is the only real defense against ESD.
Study this section
Every lesson that covers Common Safety Procedures on the 220-1202 exam.